Jump to content

Talk:Tony DeAngelo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Tony DeAngelo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 23:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "He was removed from the ice during the second period of the Sting's January 31 game against the Guelph Storm, and the OHL released a statement on February 14 that DeAngelo would be suspended for eight games following a violation of the league's Harassment and Abuse/Diversity Policy." The year should be added here, and could be removed for the last sentence of the paragraph.
  • "Despite these incidents," Not mentioned in text.
  • "director of amateur scouting" Is this a title that should be capitalized?
  • Nothing for his personal life except his political views?
    • The deeper he falls into extremism, the harder it is to find anything outside of his political views (he also doesn't have a romantic partner or children, which is usually an easy go-to). I found one charity event he participated in in 2018. Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "US president" should be expanded and linked.
  • Picked up a 97% using the copyvio tool, but that website seems to be scrapping content from Wikipedia.

That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burner Twitter account

[edit]

Hey y'all. Another user and I are having a bit of an edit war over the mentioning of DeAngelo's burner Twitter account. They removed it, I put it back, they removed it again, I put it back again. I think it's culturally relevant; it's how I personally found out about Tony DeAngelo's existence. If we're gonna mention DeAngelo's conroversies, I think it's worthwile to include this one. Also I am trying not to assume bad faith but the other user in question's contributions history indicates right-leaning political positions which could indicate motive for wanting to remove that piece from this article. I have my own political positions so that allegation could be pointed back at me and that would be understandable, but from a purely outside-looking-in perspective I think the burner account stuff is worth mentioning. Let me know what y'all think. Thanks :) Qster2323 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]