Talk:Tone cluster/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA Sweeps: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would be beneficial to update the access dates for all of the sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 17:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To raise further

We need to disambiguate the words tone and note as used in different countries. To me (in UK) a tone is two semitones. We tend to use the phrase note cluster in the UK, since note is the word used for a particular identified pitch. Perhaps non-biased language should be used? See my comment on the talk page about the lead and consider the fact that later sections actually use the UK word... --Jubilee♫clipman 03:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's something I wouldn't know too much about. However, if would be a good idea to start a discussion or direct people from the related WikiProjects who would have a better understanding of which word choice to use. Perhaps the first instance should include both mentions (indicating any difference) and then stick with one throughout the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]