Talk:Tom Mustill

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 June 2023 by reviewer Carpimaps (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Tom Mustill is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Advice/clarification welcome

Hi folks,

I'm largely responsile for this page's creation. It's my first from-scratch Wiki draft so I have tried to follow the guidelines/best practice and cite/source everything appropriately, and to take my guide from existing, long-standing pages of similar personalities. I have check the guidelines for notability, reviewed against the Wiki style guides (as best as I'm able), avoided relying on subject's own publications/website and edited out several areas/content that related to awards on the basis that these could dipslay bias/verge on press releasery.

However, I should also flag that I have a COI (a non-financial, non-work-related relationship to the subject) and so am not best placed to judge whether the article as a whole has merit/passes the standards required for a Wiki. If any editors have any suggestions for improvement I am happy to hear them.

Thanks! OtisSpanner (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Filmography sourcing

Thanks to @Mattdaviesfsic for your feedback having reviewed the draft of this page.

I have now added links to the Filmography table to source the page subject's involvement/role in each of those listed, and removed a couple from the table where IMDB (which I believe isn't counted under Wiki guidelines as a reliable source) was the only public reference I could find.

Does this help resolve your feedback, or were/are you looking for sourcing for other info within the table (e.g. links to reviews/press coverage of the programmes to demonstrate their notability in their own right)?

Any confirmation/advice you could give would be much appreciated so I don't waste anyone's time resubmitting for review prematurely! OtisSpanner (talk) 12:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's brilliant. Feel free to resubmit when you want and I - or another reviewer - will accept it. Well done, great work! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 13:58, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Thanks for coming back so quickly, and for your time reviewing/advising to help me improve it. OtisSpanner (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the amends have been made, reviewed and marked as acceptable (c-class page) by a reviewer, I have now removed the warning labels added in August 2022. OtisSpanner (talk) 07:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]