Talk:Tolcapone

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tolcapone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Capone

This is not a joke: I attended the University of Kansas Medical Center, where the namer of this drug once worked. It was well known at the institution that this person was an Al Capone fan. He later worked for the drug company that developed Tolcapone. There was an employee contest to name the drug and his Al Capone-inspired appellation won. Tolcapone was born. This is, of course, "original research." I'm hoping the Wikipedia folks will overlook this.

Is there a reliable source that confirms this? ... discospinster _talk 20:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I cannot cite a published source. I can only give my word, as someone who worked in the Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, & Therapeutics at the University of Kansas Medical Center. Of course, I understand that this is probably not acceptable evidence and that it constitutes original research. I was just hoping to sneak that by. Sorry. I just think it is a fun factoid. Oh well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.26.120.184 (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis

I removed the technical flag after rewriting the 2008 synthesis as a narrative that describes the purpose of each step. This should make it slightly clearer for readers with the necessary background knowledge. Roches (talk) 08:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]