Talk:Togo at the 2018 Winter Olympics/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 01:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TheDragonFire (talk · contribs) 09:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
Petitjean was born in Niger
needed a closer citation (fixed in 1). Petitjean's race times for the Women's 10 km freestyle had accidentally been substituted with those from the 84th position Chinbatyn Otgontsetseg (fixed in 1). Everything else seems in order.
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- The article is quite short, but since it covers a very limited subject matter this seems appropriate.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- The caption for the photo of Mathilde-Amivi Petitjean is sparse, perhaps we could clarify where it is from (fixed by 1).
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Thank you for your nomination, It is a wonderful world. I identified some minor issues with the article, but have boldly resolved these myself. I am now comfortable to pass this. TheDragonFire (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)