Talk:Together Party

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Name

Shouldn't the name of this page be translated into English, just like in case of Civic Platform, Modern (political party) or Coalition for the Renewal of the Republic - Freedom and Hope? Moreover I'm sure that the abbreviated version of party's name, Razem (Together), is the one used, not Partia Razem (Together Party) (compare this with Nowoczesna, even though their name is Nowoczesna Ryszarda Petru or even Platforma Obywatelska, whose full legal name is actually Platforma Obywatelska RP. 178.42.112.39 (talk) 23:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I never liked the idea of translating the names of parties when they don't do it themselves, so I'll abstain on this one. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Democratic socialism?

Why is their ideology described as "democratic socialism"? Some of their key members used to be socialists, but the party has no socialist elements in its program. Litawor (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Partia Razem.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Central-Eastern European Green Left Alliance (CEEGLA)

On the 12th of January, the formation of a coalition of six Central and Eastern European left-wing groups (Budoucnost (CZ), Lewica Razem, Sotsialnyi Rukh (UA), Szikra (HU), Demos (RO), and Kartu (LT)) called CEEGLA (Central-Eastern European Green Left Alliance) was announced on Twitter/X. Bean Dlunt (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a draft for an article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:PorazonyCreeper/Draft/Central-Eastern_European_Green_Left_Alliance

Is CEEGLA notorious enough to warrant its own separate page, or should we just mention it briefly on this page? PorazonyCreeper (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PorazonyCreeper I think it's important enough to warrant its own page. Bean Dlunt (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Political position

https://popu-list.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/The-PopuList-3.0-short-version.pdf

This list describes this party as far-left (and not even as a borderline case). This is not my personal opinion, but might be considered (like in other articles stating how a party was described liberal, libertarian etc. with the source for each description).

More about the PopuList: https://popu-list.org/about/ 91.21.7.61 (talk) 04:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least 4 sources provided that Confederation is a populist party, yet this source here does not state that fact. Therefore this source can and does contain inaccuracies. Also a singlar source even if reliable is not a consensus.YBSOne (talk) 16:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]