This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
The page was completely uncited and full of misinformation: that's why the drastic change was made. I'm about to undo your edit since it removed cited material and restored nonsense. — cardiff | chestnut — 03:43, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
makes sense now. I think we should try to find a way to format his life / this page at least somewhat along the lines of the previous edit -as I think it makes it look nicer and he is a character who I think is capable of being divided into subsections. I think we can do without the "Tlepolemus love's" section - as I don't think he was renouned as being a man in that regard - but he can be divided into sections to call attention to him as a part of Heraclidian / Rhodisian / and Trojan myth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dondoolee (talk • contribs) 05:48, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One of the issues with the Rhodian myth is that it was mostly a modern fiction that had little basis in Greco-Roman literature. There is also the bit about Tlepolemus' role in the Mysian debacle that doesn't jibe with the only source that I've been able to find, but I'll keep looking. I'll try to flesh out the Trojan content so that at least two sections can be sustained in a reasonably readable, and factual, manner. (I should point out that none of the material added to this article by Dondoolee has been imaginary: these bits all came through an IP and one long-dormant user.) — cardiff | chestnut — 05:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
