Talk:Tittybangbang

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television: British

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Update

I have been through the entire article and cleared it up a bit. I've now transferred the catchphase information to the parts that explain the character's sketches to keep it all tidy and I have transferred the information in the series 1, 2 and 3 sections to the history section, as that seemed to be what they were anyway. I have also added some more detail to the information on the third series sketch characters and I've re-added the cast section. Overall, the article is now an easier read and is tidier. CyberWiki (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More updates

Since most sketch comedy articles (such as Little Britain and The Catherine Tate Show) on Wikipedia appear to be cutting their length down, I've done some trimming on the Tittybangbang article, and re-organised things so as not to lose information, but to make it easier to read. CyberWiki (talk) 12:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Cult Show"

Can this be justifiably labeled a 'cult show'? It just seems to be merely verbal filler, as well as highly unfitting considering the description on wikipedia's own page on cult films and tv, which this show, frankly, doesn't derserve. I think it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.24.79 (talk) 18:42, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it can. This show fits the description in the Cult Following article in that it has a loyal group of people that watch it series after series. Your own comment appears to be based more on what seems to be a dislike of the show than what cult actually means. CyberWiki (talk) 19:31, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the definition? A casual viewer might watch more than one series, what evidence of a 'dedicated' following in the way that Spaced, Brasseye and Garth Marenghi's Darkplace has is there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.18.148 (talk) 17:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There actually is. According to the Wikipedia page for Garth Marenghi's Darkplace, the viewing figures were poor and it only aired one series, while Tittybangbang's were good and it ended up airing three. I don't want the lot of us to get into an argument over this, I'm just going by what I see. Not only this, but I know quite a number of people, both online and in real life, who have enjoyed Tittybangbang and watched it series upon series. DerangedOwl (talk) 12:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having edited and added to an article which had already been written and edited by several other people - and that being my 'Wiki debut' - I invite comments from those others on my contribution and ask if they could share any sources of further information that they may have (and I don't).

My edition was based on my memory of the 1st Series and sources such as the linked BBC3 site. The only items I deleted from previous editions of the article were spelling errors, except for the reference to Nichola and Pamela being Australian. I hope the parts authored by me are acceptable to the previous contributors; please holler if they are not.

I would also like to contact those people to ask if they might be interested in other TBB-related projects (see my yahoo group, also linked from the article).

Sorry about the newbie/techo problems I'm having. I have searched the help and tutorial pages, FAQs etc, and it seems I can't create my own profile because AOL uses a shared proxy server (or something). I could not find a window like this one (or a link to one) in either the 'My Talk' or 'Community' sections. So I shall risk my e-mail address here:

Jason4sanity@aol.com

Does anybody know who plays Diane, the third member of the Darts Team? My best guess is, Shelley Longworth, whom I haven't yet added to the credits because I need to be more sure about her before I enter her (so to speak).

Jason4sanity

As funny as a stick.

I would love to know the name of the piece of classical music playing in the background in the "museum" scenes!

Nearly all the "ladies fighting in museum" scenes and a fair few of the "Don't look at me! I'm shy" scenes are backed up by this beautiful string orchestral piece. I remember hearing it as a child but obviously cannot find its name or composer anywhere else! Thanks. 82.19.97.121 02:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SO POV

This article is so POV it is crazy.lol BYE BYE Jimmy93211 18:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is your comment that is "so POV", not the article, because you fail to supply any evidence that anything in the article is factually incorrect or even contestable.

Jason4sanity

Fair use rationale for Image:Tittybangbang Series1 DVD.gif

Image:Tittybangbang Series1 DVD.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tittybangbang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060113001419/http://www.pettproductions.co.uk/ to http://www.pettproductions.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]