Talk:Title X

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hello, I am looking to majorly revise this article to be more comprehensive, detailed, and up-to-date. Please let me know if you have any objections to me modifying the structure of this article and basically starting over (none of the facts included in the current article will be omitted in the revised version). I will wait at least 24 hours before posting the revised article.

Thanks!

Ejc59 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Congress link?

I came to this article to fact check a possible claim that Title X was enacted by a Republican controlled congress. Would it be appropriate to add a link to the 91st US Congress article? 47.156.166.140 (talk) 22:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sterilization

How is the sterilization section connected to Title X? This should be clarified or removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.111.180.244 (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. While it is no doubt forced sterilization is a very important concern, the inclusion here implies that the perpetrator of the sterilization was the Title X act itself. This is not true. The perpetrator was Planned Parenthood and other organizations that received funding through Title X. If you read the text of the 1970 Title X bill, it is very clear that the receipt of all aid must be voluntary and must not be coercive or tied to any other form of aid that the recipient was eligible for. The paragraph in question would imply that the Congress that voted Title X into law had the intent of sterilizing Native Americans. That is just not true.

The sterilization issue should be moved down into "See also". If one doesn't already exist , a new Wiki page should be opened up to document this subject.

By the way (off topic), why isn't a link to the text of the 1970 law provided? I had to go searching for it:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-84/pdf/STATUTE-84-Pg1504.pdf Dad98253 (talk) 21:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe add a link to Marie Sanchez, too? Dad98253 (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]