Talk:Tishaura Jones

Tishaura Jones has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 12, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 7, 2021.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Tishaura Jones, the new mayor of St. Louis, once started a GoFundMe fundraiser to take down a Confederate monument?

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tishaura Jones article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Black Lives Matter

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

St. Louis Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis (Politics), a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Green: 2021

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Green project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in GreenWikipedia:WikiProject Women in GreenTemplate:WikiProject Women in GreenWomen in Green

Electoral history article

Just a comment, Jones' electoral history is probably just lengthy enough that it could warrant a split to its own article (i.e. Electoral history of Jason Kander and Electoral history of Kyrsten Sinema). It could also remain here until another election or 2. TJMSmith (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with splitting (though I'm kind of indifferent, TBH). If you think article size or readability is an issue, than I would definitely support. Kander is the more convincing argument to me, as he's another candidate in the same state who, like Jones, has taken on a higher profile than expected for the positions he has. Also, Jones currently has a longer electoral history than Kander. Seeing as the next election she'll be on the ballot for (STL mayor primary) is about two months away, and plausibly she'll be on the ballot again in April, I don't see the need to wait around for this change. Thanks for the comment. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TJMSmith: I have created the page. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 22:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Video from 2012

I found a YouTube video of Tishaura Jones speaking in 2012, licensed under Creative Commons. I'm not sure how useful it is and, more importantly, how to upload part of a video, so I'm posting it here in case anyone is interested. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Content should be changed to reflect Jones' victory in the 2021 St. Louis mayoral election. Namely, change "Jones is a candidate in the 2021 St. Louis mayoral election, which she advanced to a runoff in against Cara Spencer on March 2, 2021." to "Jones will become mayor of St. Louis after winning the most votes in the 2021 St. Louis mayoral election, in which she beat out Cara Spencer in the polls. She will be the city's first African-American woman to serve in the position.", and change the "2021 St. Louis mayoral campaign" section accordingly. Goldenseek (talk) 03:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done, looks like this has been updated now. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 05:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tishaura Jones/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 19:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: ✓ Pass

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: ✓ Pass
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: ✓ Pass

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: ✓ Pass

C. It contains no original research: ✓ Pass

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: ✓ Pass
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: ✓ Pass

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): ✓ Pass
Will ask @Novem Linguae: for second opinion, I am little bit concerned about the size and the amount of details of her career, also regarding her fathers fraud etc. pp.
Overall, looks pretty good. I think the father being convicted is OK to mention, because a secondary source links it to a corruption scandal that Jones was involved in. I'd recommend the following changes to improve the article, if the GA author agrees: 1) Condense (or break into sub-sections) the "St. Louis Treasurer" section, which is a little long. 2) Reduce WP:PROSELINE in "St. Louis Treasurer" section, by removing some dates and focusing on summarizing important ideas. 3) Elaborate on this Craig Walker corruption allegation. In both spots where he is mentioned, it feels incomplete and I am left with questions. Was this a valid allegation? Did anybody do further investigation? What was the exact allegation? What exactly did Walker do that might be corruption? Thanks for submitting this to GA. Good luck. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done first point, broke apart section "St. Louis Treasurer" into subsections. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have made some edits that I believe addresses the proseline in the "St. Louis Treasurer" section. However, given that this one is more subjective, more input would be appreciated if editors still find it to be insufficient. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Added more content on Craig Walker, and pinging Novem Linguae now that these concerns have been addressed. To answer (briefly) some of your questions: Yes, the report was valid in that the treasurer's office did in fact do business with his company, but Jones and others argued that there was no wrongdoing and that the incident was blown out of proportion. No, there was no further investigation (it's hard to prove the lack of something, but I've looked pretty exhaustively here). There wasn't really an exact allegation in the report, which is noted by this editorial: "Importantly, there is no claim made or evidence provided in the Post report that Tishaura O. Jones mishandled public money in doing business with IFS Securities, a black-owned firm." Thank you both for taking on this review, and if you have any further questions or concerns do not hesitate to let me know. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
AllegedlyHuman, looks good to me. Thanks for being so open to feedback. Good luck with your review. Ping CommanderWaterford. –Novem Linguae (talk) 06:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: ✓ Pass
Will ask @Novem Linguae: for second opinion, I am little bit concerned about the size and the amount of details of her career, also regarding her fathers fraud etc. pp.
Please see above. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: ✓ Pass
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: ✓ Pass

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: ✓ Pass
Overall:
Pass or Fail: ✓ Pass

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 10:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Tishaura Jones

... that Tishaura Jones (pictured), the new mayor of St. Louis, once started a GoFundMe fundraiser to take down a Confederate monument? (Source: NYT)

Reviewed: Izkia Siches

Improved to Good Article status by AllegedlyHuman (talk). Self-nominated at 08:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Meets requirements. Nice work on this article! (t · c) buidhe 23:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restructuring

It seems to me this article needs a bit of restructuring. The first paragraph provides the high-level stuff, but then there are four more paragraphs in the "lede", which seems to need a table of contents of its own. The final paragraph of the lede describes her 2017 defeat, not her 2021 victory as mayor (over Lewis Reed, who pled guilty to bribery charges in August 2022). I'm guessing that voters in Seattle are interested in this the way that Tishaura Jones became mayor, since Seattle is considering moving to a system similar to St. Louis's method. What's the best way of making the fifth paragraph emphasize Jones' 2021 victory rather than her 2017 defeat, without splitting those paragraphs up and making the lede of this article even longer? Should the subsections have lead sections of their own? Is the article divided up into the correct number of sections? Given that "Mayor of St. Louis" is her most significant achievement (by Wikipedia standards), shouldn't the bulk of the lede be about her current office? -- RobLa (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Political Science Research Methods POLS 2399

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 1 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zoegoffe (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Krodinehardy (talk) 17:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]