Talk:Timex Expedition WS4

A fact from Timex Expedition WS4 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 January 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the face of the Timex Expedition WS4 (pictured) resembles the shape of the rear window of a Land Rover?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Timex Expedition WS4.

Wikipedia

Watches

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Watches, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of watches on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WatchesWikipedia:WikiProject WatchesTemplate:WikiProject WatchesWatches

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Land Rover rear window

Several points here about "Its face resembles the rear window of a Land Rover". (1) This applies to older Discovery models, not to any Land Rover (2) Why is this WP worthy? It shouts "so what" to me. (3) In detail, the shape is mirrored which reduces its impact. Would anyone object if I removed the sentence as irrelevant? ( I have no objection to it remaining in the Reception section.) -- SGBailey (talk) 08:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, regarding your point 2, the hook was interesting enough to get 6567 hits and qualify for DYK Stats. Your point 3 does not matter because the reliable source says "resembles", not "identical". Your point 1 is also moot because the hook says "a Land Rover", not "all Land Rovers" or even the "latest Land Rover". In conclusion, it is the DYK-stats supported, i.e. interesting, hook of a DYK article, the design of the face of the watch is notable, being part of its aesthetics, so, for all of these reasons, the hook remains. Dr. K. 06:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]