Talk:Timeline of Facebook

	This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Riceissa (talk · contribs) has been paid by Vipul. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Vipul https://contractwork.vipulnaik.com/worker.php?worker=Issa+Rice https://github.com/vipulnaik/contractwork/blob/master/contributor-lists/issa-list.mediawiki

When did Facebook Games come into play?

Most people say "Snake" is the oldest game on FB, but I can't find its release date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.135.167.21 (talk) 11:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the infamous "$15 billion valuation"

As a site that is supposed to be factual, I think Wikipedia has to not mention that silly $15 billion valuation number from 2008. It was not valued at that high at the time. It was just one stupid blog not understanding the Microsoft deal in which they paid for a small piece of ownership AND ad exclusivity. The bulk of what Microsoft paid was for the ad exclusivity. (Case in point..Microsoft paid about the same amount for the ad exclusivity and the small piece of ownership as Google paid for JUST ad exclusivity on MySpace.) Yes one stupid blog assumed that Microsoft paid for the piece of Facebook and Zuckerberg threw the ad exclusivity in for free, so they did the faulty math and came up with that $15 billion valuation. And as is always the case on the internet, other blogs just mindlessly quoted the original incorrect number as a fact, until enough blogs were posting it and everyone believed it since no one is allowed to think for themselves online.

The very fact that it was assumed to be valued at $15 billion in June 2008, and then just two months later when they ACTUALLY sold some shared to private investors, at a value of $3-5 billion should be the obvious indicator that the $15 billion valuation was BS.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Timeline of Facebook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.quickfire.tv/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:22, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Timeline of Facebook. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=357292
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722003201/http://valleywag.gawker.com/280901/a-brief-history-of-mark-zuckerbergs-legal-woes to http://valleywag.gawker.com/280901/a-brief-history-of-mark-zuckerbergs-legal-woes
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8048220/Facebook-10-milestones-on-the-way-to-social-success.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140920231637/http://sfist.com/2014/09/17/drag-queens-facebook-real-name-controversy-update.php to http://sfist.com/2014/09/17/drag-queens-facebook-real-name-controversy-update.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]