Talk:Tim Vipond/GA2
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessment will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 03:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Instructions: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment
Observations
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- The Infobox does not give a year of birth.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Reference 1 is user generated, it is a press release announcing the launch of CFI's new Advanced Excel Formulas Course.
- Reference 2 is an interview on Business in Vancouver, a business news site; non-substantial
- Reference 3 is about participation in the Dartmouth men's squash team
- Reference 4 is an article on thesoftwarereport.com - a reasonable history of his business achievements.
- Reference 5 is a dead link. See archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/20180409045041/http://www.sauder.ubc.ca/Programs/MBA/MBA_Full_Time/Student_Life/Student_Profiles/Tim_Vipond
- Reference 5 is somewhat MOS:PEACOCK, promoting the School of Business rather than Vipond.
- Reference 6 is a dead link. See archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/20170809133359/http://www.chainstoreage.com/article/shoescom%E2%80%99s-q1-gross-revenue-89-amid-repeat-traffic
- Reference 6 talks about repeat business and gross revenue up 89%; it does not talk about the bid to take over Osisko Mining. Confusing.
- Reference 7 is advertising material for Sauder School Of Business; Vipond gets a mention. is all.
- Reference 8 is Linked In, (a dead link). Linked in is considered a user generated source and is self-sourced: See WP:SELFSOURCE and WP:ABOUTSELF
- Reference 9 is a website for a company founded by Vipond. It is not about Vipond himself.
- Reference 10 is about CFI and the training courses founded by Vipond. It is promotional in nature.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article is divided up into Early life and education, Career, Founding Corporate Finance Institute, Awards and honours
- The article narrates the subject's career as an investment banker and financial analyst who founded a financial investment institute.
- Subject does not have an entry in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- A number of references are laudatory and promotional in nature.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Page created 20 September 2016
- Article has 65 edits from 12 editors
- Page views in the past 30 days = 365
- Page views in the past 90 days = 1207, daily average of 13
- Page history shows primary editing in 2106, 14 edits since
- Page Creator is Meatsgains; has not contributed to the article since 2017
- Article is considered stable
- Notifying Editors:
- Top Editor Meatsgains: latest edit = 2021-05-14 23:22
- Next editor is Jjj84206: currently editing
- Next editor is Timmuthy who made edits in 2016. On this user's talk page, there is a statement that he owns the business and is related to Vipond. Invitation to comment declined.
- A total of two involved editors were able to be notified.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Article has no images
- Consideration:
Far any biography of a living person in business or economics, they may meet any of the following standards:
- The person has received a well-known and significant award or honour, or has been nominated for such an award several times.
- The person has made a widely recognised contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field.
- The person has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary (e.g. the Dictionary of National Biography).
- Overall:
- Article is considered to not meet broad in coverage nor neutral point of view.
- Involved editors are invited to address these issues and issues raised in references. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made; Matters raised in the reassessment were not addressed. These matters will remain valid until the next GA Review, whereupon they must be addressed first. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2021 (UTC)