Talk:Tim Hetherington

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tim Hetherington article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Africa: Liberia / Libya / Sierra Leone Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Liberia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Liberia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as Low-importance).
	Sierra Leone portal This article is supported by WikiProject Sierra Leone.

Merseyside Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography: History Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RPG or mortar?

There are no sources in the article citing it was an RPG tthat caused his death. My sources tells its was a mortor attack that lead to his death. http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/report-restrepo-director-tim-heatherington-killed-in-lybia/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.127.160.246 (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And there is video footage of the doctor who drove him to the field hospital describing the an 81mm mortar. From Kevin Dawes' videos.132.162.133.54 (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

County of birth

It is standard to state the county of birth of the subject. Birkenhead, which has been in Merseyside since that county's inception on 1 April 1974, was in Cheshire when Hetherington was born there in 1970. Jim Michael (talk) 15:30, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that the Wirral used to be wholly in Cheshire and is now partly in Merseyside. However, parts of the Wirral are still in Cheshire, but Birkenhead is not. It is confusing to use historical county boundaries rather than current ones, especially in this case where the boundary is blurred over time. It is also confusing to a reader with no knowledge of this. Imagine putting Rhodesia as a place of birth rather than Zimbabwe. The history of the boundaries are well covered on the Wirral Peninsula page if the reader is interested in them.82.133.93.217 (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is standard to state the county it was in at the time, not the county it is in now. The same goes for countries, we state Ceylon as the birthplace for people born in what was then Ceylon, not Sri Lanka, if it wasn't called that then. Jim Michael (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this standard cited? Who are we? There is no standard followed on this list: Category:People from Birkenhead Donovanhide (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox person#Parameters states that the administrative region should be included for birth and death in the infobox. By 'we', I mean Wikipedians. Jim Michael (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is descending into pedantry, but it does not state Administrative Region at the time of birth. There doesn't seem to be an accepted standard; I think most people associate Birkenhead with the Wirral and Merseyside.Donovanhide (talk) 18:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find a guide that says 'at the time', but it is usual practice, and is obvious to me. The county should be stated, and it is nonsensical to say he was born in Merseyside, as that county didn't exist when he was born. See Fred Dibnah for example - he was born in Bolton and died there, but its county changed during his lifetime. Infobox says born Bolton, Lancashire; died Bolton, Greater Manchester. Birkenhead has been in Merseyside for 37 years, so it's not surprising that it is associated with that county now. Jim Michael (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Telemachus

This 22 April 2011 change by Sam Blacketer (talk · contribs) claims The Times gave one of his middle names as Telemachus. I couldn't find a ref for that and since I did find one for The Guardian obituary that did mention his full name I'm assuming that the claim that the Greek word for "far from battle" was one of his middle names was a practical joke that Sam Blacketer was playing on us all. I'll bring this to Sam Blacketer's attention in case such a reference exists, but otherwise it would be a bit ironic for an IP editor to revert vandalism by an editor registered since for over four years. 67.101.7.246 (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to check the reference, find a copy of Friday 22 April's edition of The Times and turn to page 70. The reference is in the first column, fourth paragraph down. Alternatively you can visit the online version although it is behind a paywall. Anyone else who is subscribed is welcome to confirm it. Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Louie"

Season 2, episode 11 (titled "Duckling") of "Louie", a tv show by comedian Louis C.K., is about his trip to Afghanistan to make the troops laugh and the episode is dedicated to Tim Hetherington. Should this be mentioned somewhere? Filmography? - Bart (talk) 23:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say no, it's not, as it's so inconsequential. Wikipedia shouldn't be a repository for a random collection of factoids. Lopifalko (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tim Hetherington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tim Hetherington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tim Hetherington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]