Talk:Tidal creek

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Limnology and Oceanography Low‑importance

	Oceans portal This article is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 October 2018 and 10 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Galbraithek.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sufficient depth

In the article, sufficient depth of water for what? -- Dalbury^(Talk) 16:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In British English...

I would note that creek means a tidal channel in parts of the United States, as well. For instance, almost all of the narrow passages separating keys in the Florida Keys are known as creeks. I'm not sure about other parts of the U.S., but I think the current opening statement is misleading. -- Donald Albury^(Talk) 23:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I think there is little reason to keep this separate from stream. I recommend a merge and redirect. Zab 23:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge The concept of a tidal creek is a large topic which certainly merits its own page. There are many aspects of a tidal creek that are quite distinct from a freshwater stream. (electrical conductivity, salinity, aquatic species etc) Cuvette 16:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merge I agree with Cuvette that a stream and tidal creek are very different things. Considering that the word "creek" is synonymous with stream in much of inland North America, the saltwater version needs its own page, if only to highlight the difference.Amwyll Rwden (talk) 13:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Creek (tidal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080703211312/http://www.sprucecreekassociation.org/sprucecreek.html to http://www.sprucecreekassociation.org/sprucecreek.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Create "List of tidal creeks" or category?

Rather than letting the list of examples in this article grow haphazardly, I think it would be better to create either a list article or a category of tidal creeks. I'm not sure which I prefer at this point. Any thoughts? - Donald Albury 13:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 April 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. Consensus is clear, and straightforward. BD2412 T 03:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creek (tidal) → Tidal creek – Avoid the use of unneeded parenthetical disambiguation. The article text already supports the usage of "tidal creek" to distinguish its subject from other things referred to as creeks. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 00:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support - makes sense as WP:NATURALDIS. I can find multiple sources that use this phrase. -- Netoholic @ 01:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Makes sense, per Netholic. - Donald Albury 12:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rreagan007 (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Commonly used as well as natural disambiguation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tidal creek is commonly used in scientific literature. Google scholar search results for "tidal creek" returns 16,900 results. Jayzlimno (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.