Talk:Thyroglobulin

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image

Needs a picture. Actually, may not need to be here at all. An article on storage proteins, or Iodine metabolism might be more useful.

Should the small number of Tyrosyl residues mentioned in the introduction be <20 rather than >20? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.156.157.91 (talk) 18:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Endocrine Rev doi:10.1210/er.2015-1090 JFW | T@lk 12:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image moved here temporarily

The following anatomical image is moved here to Talk, as it lacks a legend, its labels are not mentioned in the text, and when the text addresses anatomical matters, it uses different terms distinct from those appearing in the image labels. Hence, even to a well-educated reader, reading the text and image in the context of one another is confusing. On return of the image to the article, please rectify the issues with regard to stand-alone understandability, and also create a <ref>...</ref> entry citing Gray et al 1918 available at the image entry at Wikimedia Commons (since being out of copyright does not, in honest academic work—see [1]—allow use of material without attribution/recognition of source. Cheers. Le Prof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leprof 7272 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]