Talk:Thurstonfield Lough
Appearance
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depth.
[edit]Once the article said 6 foot, now it says 6000 feet, and described as "very deep and wet" which makes me think the 6000 feet is wrong. With no references I can only guess what is right. I assume "wet" is correct. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)