Talk:Three Years Jotna

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	The Gambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Gambia.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 16 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nna Bankoo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabreen Abdelrahman's Peer Review

Lead: The lead is straight to the point and gives readers a good understanding of the topic of the article.
Structure: To help better understand the topic, the content might better be structured by calling the "About the Movement" section "Background" and then creating two corresponding sections titled "Goals" and "History." Next, it might be helpful to split up "The Fallout" section into more categories before "The Firing of Darboe" so that it's not as long and flows easier. The section titles could be more concise and the pictures placed so that they do not interrupt any paragraphs.
Balance: Besides the Fallout section which could be broken up a little, the rest of the article is well-balanced.
Neutral Content: You do a great job of clearly presenting the facts and staying neutral throughout the article.
Sources: There are plenty of informative sources but it might be helpful to add sources from academic journals that could also bring more depth to the article and help present the topic in a neutral manner.
SabreenAbd (talk) 05:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and Detail

Despite what the peer reviewer said above, this article is not functioning in an encyclopedic fashion. It has way too much petty detail on matters that are only of interest to the group itself, but questionable or useless to the general reader. And it is pretty much a repeat of the group's mission statement with complaints about President Barrow and the group's trial. It reads much more like a complaint-filled autobiography than an encyclopedic article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:05, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this article is insane. It would better serve readers looking for an encyclopedic article to have this page deleted and for them to look for other sources. El819 (talk) 01:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]