Talk:Three-jet event

Ellis–Karliner angle

Should it be a separate article? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. It just describes a minor property of this topic. Also, it's written like a subsection already. dude❶❽❶❽ (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it shouldnt be a seperate article, as it is a very small topic, and should be a subsection under a larger topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anichat21 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least it should be rewritten. For example one of the cited paper (the PLUTO one) does not mention this angle at all, they worked with the $x_1$ distribution. I guess this whole section is rather about the spin-1 property of gluons. Maybe it should be named rather by that.. "Deduction of further gluon properties from three jet events". Or just skip the title at all. Since the whole three jet thing is about gluons and its properties. Anonymmaus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

==

the 4th "snapshot" image undertext says "inconsistent with observations" while the text above it says the reverse.

Kudos

Kudos to the writers of this article. There are plenty of places to make common errors with wp:hyphen and wp:numeral, but I didn't see any! Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 05:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]