Talk:Three-date rule
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three-date rule redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Who is changing the numbers? Please read the source. It clearly says "One: 12.74%"
I'm not sure that this is quite notable enough for its own article. There are a few sources on Google News that mention it, and thus I think it could easily mentioned in Dating. However, there does not seem to be significant coverage of the concept itself in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with NinjaRobotPirate to merge this article (or only some of it) into the Dating article. Seems like there are only a few references. I researched the topic of dating extensively a while back and did not come across any "three-date rule" so my sense is that it is not much of a topic.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
I Can NOT stand the current dating page itself.. So Hollywood.. If we promote people to continue to date this way - promoting early sexual interaction etc.. are we promoting the continuation of the current divorce rates.. The WIKI page is written by a hollywood lover.. not a sociology student at all. Students are debating the word dating today and trying to establish a social norm that makes sense for the future of our social well being.. Not ascribing to the crap we see on TV and in movies.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.198 (talk) 19:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)