Talk:Those Dancing Days

This article was nominated for deletion on December 30, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1st attempt

This band is pretty notable.
Very hyped up by the NME, a nomination for the best band in Sweden, frequent play on MTV2, etc...
There are far less notable bands that have articles on wikipedia.
Additionally I must attack the way the tag was added- within seconds of the page's creation. There's no way the band's notability could have been checked in that time. --Josquius (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd attempt

They meet the following:

1: That I've seen at the very least they've been in NME a fair few times including one big feature. They've also been featured on a lot of online sources.
4: They've definatly done that. Just look to their myspace, all their upcoming gigs are abroad.
7: Debatable here but IMO they're one of the more well known current Swedish bands.
8: The MTV Europe awards nomination. That's quite a big deal
11: Not on the radio that I know of but they are on regular rotation on MTV2. Surely that is covered by that too?

I must state that- yeah they aren't the most well known band in the world.
Compared to many bands with articles on wikipedia however they are The Beatles. (i.e. These)--Josquius (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's some links a quick google search brings up:

http://music.guardian.co.uk/pop/story/0,,2159023,00.html

http://www.clickmusic.com/articles/5639/Interview-Those-Dancing-Days.html

http://www.neumagazine.co.uk/articles/1760/Interview-Those-Dancing-Days.html

http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/articles/7230/Interview-Those-Dancing-Days.html

Some of those are pretty big (i.e. the guardian).

Is it the comment that they're still in school which brings people to mind of kids adding their own band to wikipedia here?--Josquius (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources belong here, not in External links

These sources do not ever belong in External links. I have moved the link farm from there to this talk page where they do belong. Warning: I didn't check them over, so be careful in choosing any references here. Thank you! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 21:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Those Dancing Days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071216140454/http://www.wichita-recordings.com:80/artist.php/thosedancingdays/ to http://www.wichita-recordings.com/artist.php/thosedancingdays/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:52, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Those Dancing Days. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]