Talk:Thomas Round

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gilbert and Sullivan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gilbert and Sullivan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gilbert and SullivanWikipedia:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanTemplate:WikiProject Gilbert and SullivanGilbert and Sullivan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Duplications

The Danilo for Sadler's Wells - staged at SW and also at the Coli - is one and the same production. There was certainly not a Royal Command Performance. HM may have turned up, but it wasn't like Queen Victoria getting Carte's company down to Windsor. That didn't happen in the 1950s. This is an otiose duplication and should be removed. - Tim riley (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should have said Royal Variety Performance, but I guess that is not notable enough to mention. See: http://www.eabf.org.uk/royal-variety-performance/archive/1950s/1958 -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused about the timing. We need to clarify that he repeated the role in 1958, no? -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No. TR played Danilo (well-reviewed as I have mentioned earlier in the article) in frequent revivals for Sadler's Wells. The Coliseum revival was not specially notable - certainly doesn't need a second mention when he had sung so many other more important roles in multiple revivals for the Wells. Immediately after the Coli Widow he joined D'Oyly Carte in Dublin. See Rollins and Witts, p, 182. - Tim riley (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I see your point. Sorry to belabor the issue, but Stone says that he joined DOC in Dublin for a few weeks, AND THEN he played Danilo at the Coliseum for two months, so is he wrong? If not, I think it makes sense to mention that he started at DOC at the end of the season, then in July to Sept 1958 did another Danilo, and then resumed at DOC. Otherwise, we are not giving the chronology very clearly, it would seem. If you disagree, go ahead an remove it again. Also, should we say, in the Sadler's Wells section, which roles he played multiple times or was best known for? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've forged a compromise. I think a two-month stand is worth mentioning, and it will stand for the proposition that he did other work during his DOC years, although it would be nice to actually say that. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never to return

Sounds as if he's flouncing out in the manner of Victorian melodrama. I preferred my more neutral description. - Tim riley (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I removed the phrase. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Death

I think that the mention of Round's death should begin a new paragraph. That seems quite standard in bio articles. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Round. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020072826/http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/1.223036 to http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/1.223036

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]