Talk:Thomas Middleton

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Elizabethan theatre (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elizabethan theatre, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elizabethan theatreWikipedia:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreTemplate:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreElizabethan theatre articles

Shakespeare Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birth date?

Why is the date of his baptism put up as his birth date? 82.93.10.238 (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was a good point which no one seems to have answered. 18 April is indeed the date of his baptism, so I have removed it from the first sentence, where it looks like the date of his birth. There is no record of his exact birth date. Andrew Dalby 18:39, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

The claim that some of Middleton's relatives live in southern Wisconsin is: 1) Not particularly relevant, 2) Not footnoted, and 3) Not punctuated. Can we fix this? Also, there ought to be a source for the information regarding Middleton's punishment for A Game at Chess, rather than the awkward phrase "it has been hypothesized". 71.254.75.3 19:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Patrick Bentley[reply]

Time article on Middleton

The current edition of Time Magazine has an article on the current re-evaluation of Middleton resulting from the new anthology which is being released - it has a number of interesting and relevant quotes; comparisons between Shakespeare and Middleton, and even more interestingly a look into the sexual politics and treatment of all things sexual in Middleton. I was planning on citing a couple of the more relevant quotes in it from Middleton scholars (such as Gary Taylor), and considering introducing a brief new paragraph on sexuality and the role of women in Middleton (referenced from the Time article of course, not Original research) and expanding the section on Shakespeare & Middleton. would anyone have any major objections? peaceWarchef 11:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last Saturday's Guardian article by Gary Taylor is worth a look as well. --GuillaumeTell (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NNDB provides putative dates of birth and death for Thomas Middleton, is this likely to be reliable? Kbthompson (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Oxford Middleton Project appears to be a useful resource for the article, I've added it to ext lnks. Kbthompson (talk) 18:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC) (already there as a reference!)[reply]

Revenger's Tragedy

Though some argue he wrote "The Revenger's Tragedy," the New Mermaids and Revels Student Editions do not list him as the sole author. Either the play remains anonymous or it is accredited jointly with Cyril Tourneur. This article makes it sound like he actually wrote it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.154.52 (talk) 04:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote is slightly because there has been an gradual increase in the number of editions attributing it to Middleton. And just to clarify, the texts you mention attribute it to Middleton or Tourneur, not Middleton and Tourneur. The Drama Llama (talk) 12:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I revised it further. There is no critical consensus that Middleton wrote it. Many scholars agree he did, but then again the arguments for Tourneur are pretty good as well, leaving evidence for both tenuous at best. We'll never really know. Marston also deserves mention, even though his supporters are in the minority. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.157.121.91 (talk) 21:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rewrite is good but the Marston theory needs a citation. The Drama Llama (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone reading The Revenger's Tragedy and the Atheist's Tragedy and then works defintiely attributed to Middleton will I think be struck by a certain similarity in style between The Revenger's and Atheist's Tragedy and the same graveyard humour, "villain I'll brain thee with it" "she has a somewhat grave look about her" "what quite blasted! virtue defend me from the sin of Sodom" (I quote from memory) in contrast with a less intense more discursive, even natural certaionly more earnest style in Middleton "I coupled with your mate at barleybreak. Now we are in hell.". In other words both writers seem to be cursing the morals of the time be even puritan inclined yet where is that graveyard humour in other (if it is "other") Middleton works which abounds in The Revenger's Tragedy? On what basis do editors now believe the claim for Middleton is better than the claim for Turneur to the point of listing The Revenger's Tragedy as one of Middleton's plays and simply saying earlier editions of the play attributed the authorship to Tourneur? If authorship is no way conclusive either way, and surely it is not, I think it would be more accurate to list The Revenger's Tragedy as "disputed authorship" in Wikpedia for Thomas Middleton and do the same for Cyril Tourneur Wikipedia. YorickJenkins (talk) 17:37, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare and Middleton

The paragraph in the Works section on Middleton's supposed authorship of 1.2 is unclear (which of the three Shakespeare plays in the previous paragraph is being discussed?) and also unsupported by any sources. The claim that these attributions are driven by the desire to sell more editions of the Collected Works of Middleton rather than scholarship is also clearly a personal opinion and inappropriate without supporting evidence.96.233.85.172 (talk) 13:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-17828729 for Middleton being seen as co-author of All's Well That Ends Well. Spam guard sucks. 124.148.160.105 (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The theories that Middleton collaborated with Shakespeare are not universally accepted by scholars. Certainly not for Macbeth or Measure for Measure. Given the lack of specific citation in this article, I am revising those references. Henry chianski (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Self-Promotion

A user named DonnaNMurphy (no Wiki page) has recently edited articles on authors Thomas Nashe, Thomas Dekker, and Thomas Middleton to include references to a 2012 book by, interestingly enough, Donna N. Murphy. Edits by this user to the article "Marlovian Theory of Shakespeare Authorship" have already been tagged as "possible conflict of interest". (Murphy is a known supporter of Marlovian Theory). The Wiki text edits themselves are rather disingenuously worded, given the username, and subjectively interpreting existing material to boost one's own unprovable theories is not "evidence" in any factual sense. If Murphy herself made the changes then it appears she is using Wikipedia to promote her book and give its speculations parity with the historical information in the articles. If someone else is using her name they are not editing "in good faith" anyway. I'm undoing/reverting the Nashe, Dekker and Middleton edits until administration rules on this. Cheers. TheBawbb (talk) 16:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Middleton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150623004608/http://www.cems-oxford.org/projects/the-authorship-of-alls-well to http://www.cems-oxford.org/projects/the-authorship-of-alls-well

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revoved sentence

I have just removed this "His own plays from this decade reveal a somewhat mellowed temper. Certainly there is no comedy among them with the satirical depth of Michaelmas Term and no tragedy as bloodthirsty as The Revenger's Tragedy."

It makes no sense at all unless the two works mentioned here have already been described in an earlier section, and dated to the previous decade. It requires a statement that the play Michaelmas term is a satire, and that The Revenger's Trgedy is indeed bloodthirsty. Otherwise your reader has no context in which to place the comparison made in this decade of the subject's creativity.

Amandajm (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]