Talk:Thomas J. Fiscus

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Why?

There are NO cites in this article.

Phrases like "to his credit" are used.

"Fiscus vigorously prosecuted airmen for all sorts of infractions without mercy."

Avocats (talk) 07:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Fiscus Website

The website created by the Fiscus is pretty gud: http://www.thomasjfiscus.net.

The dude pretty much lays it all out there. Some good reading and it puts it in perspective. I think he takes advantage of perceived political conspiracy theories in order to blame his troubles on Dick Cheney, but besides that he presents a compelling case that the charges against him are not as bad as they seem. Of course he says he is guilty of nothing. I believe the truth is that there may have been some violations, but not bad enough for an Article 15 or a bust of two grades. That bust of two grades costs him thousands of dollars every month. The common enlisted soldier sitting at Fort Leavenworth may not appreciate this sacrifice, but that is a pretty damning punishment and disproportionate to the wrong doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.212.23 (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Thomas J. Fiscus/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

This article reads as though Thomas Fiscus wrote it. Except for the first couple of sentences, it is pure poppycock.

The website cited as providing the "other side" of the Fiscus story contains pure, unadulterated nonsense. Additionally, contrary to the article's claim, the Fiscus matter did not come to light around the same time as Michael D. Murphy. The Murphy case came to light well after Fiscus retired under a cloud. Fiscus claiming that the Murphy case in some way prejudiced his own is rediculous. On the other hand, Murphy, currently scheduled for Court Martial, may well pay for Fiscus' sins. The senior officers who sit on the Murphy panel (or the judge alone) is quite likely to have had quite enough of AF Senior JAGs behaving poorly.

This former two star general had female subordinates sleeping with him and affectionately calling him such things as "homey." Enough said, he should have been court-martialed. His shameless website, cited in the article, is an indication that he remains ethically challenged.64.148.255.16 (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)