Talk:Thomas Creek (Oregon)
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Identity crisis
[edit]It seems this article is neither fish nor fowl. It's written like a poorly-formed DAB page but has categories about being streams, yet listing things that are not streams. I think this needs some serious cleanup and repeated reversions by zealous WP:OWNers don't appear to be helpful. The Dissident Aggressor 00:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry about seeming zealous. Similar articles ran afoul of the DAB style, so it does not attempt to be a disambiguation page, though it serves that purpose partially.
- I have asked for comments at WT:ORE#Are_named_collections_of_features_suitable_articles.3F. —EncMstr (talk) 00:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
- Name-calling isn't going to help anything. Sure, this article's (or page's) format is not standard, but that doesn't necessarily make it wrong. Finetooth does appear to have a viable suggestion at WT:ORE. -Pete (talk) 22:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)