Talk:Thomas Bloch

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Self-promotion?

This reads like shameless self-promotion with no references, but I can't be sure. --Romanempire (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely second that. I was thinking the same thing, which was why I checked out the discussions page. The Performances and Appearances section is nothing but a ridiculously long list. The entire section should be deleted... and I am personally leaning towards saying the entire article should be deleted. In addition, there is the distinct appearance that someone has gone through several articles on instruments that Thomas Bloch plays, and has added copious amounts of promotional details and links in favor or Thomas Bloch. It is downright suspicious. What do others day? September 25, 2009

Problems with this article

There is so much wrong with this article that I don't even know where to begin. First, it's written in a tone that indicates that whoever wrote it isn't a native English speaker. This is transparent. The grammar is very poor. I tried to correct some things, but it was too much to tackle all at once. Second, the article is written like a resume, like a C.V. that someone sends out with a headshot. That is unacceptable for a Wikipedia article. Third, if Bloch is so important in this area (and I do believe that he is), then there should be sources in major magazines and newpapers referring to him. These sources need to be included in the article. Further, when you make claims like, "he is acknowledged as an expert," then you must back them up with citations! If this article continues to have no citations or sources and only grandiose claims, then I will assume Bloch is not notable and delete the article entirely. Please conform to guidelines. Thanks for understanding. Cheers, ask123 (talk) 20:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]