Talk:Thomas Aquinas/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The prose is stubby at times. The sections "Sacraments" and "Various topics" need to contain summaries of the corresponding main articles.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There are too few inline citations, particularly in the later part. Some direct quotes stand without citations, as well as several complex points that need references (e.g. the section "Revelation").

Better sources could have been used. The extensive use of Hampden, from 1848, should be replaced by more recent scholarship.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
See comment above about summaries of sub-articles.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Lampman (talk) 16:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. Lampman (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some suggestions

Can someone expend section Biographies. There are just one sentence. Also I suggest some shorter captions in section about his life. --Vojvodae ist 11:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I think that previous image in infobox is more renowned.--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 21:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]