Talk:Thirlmere

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thirlmere article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biota of Great Britain and Ireland (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Thirlmere is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name

If before the lake's construction there were two smaller lakes, neither of which was called Thirlmere, then where did the name Thirlmere come from? It would be good if the article answered this question. Marnanel (talk) 00:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at an 1867 1:10,560 OS map online. It shows the two lakes separated by a stream, but the name Thirlmere covers both and neither lake bears an individual name. So the mystery remains. PhilUK (talk) 12:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drowned villages

Two villages, Amboth and Wythburn, were drowned by the reservoir, and I remember reading somewhere that Manchester Corporation employed some dirty tricks to evict the villagers. Can anyone add details of this into the article? PhilUK (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Thirlmere/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I have looked at a map of 1818 where the lake is called Thirlmere. An older map (1784) shows Leathes Water, and Wyth Burn, but no mention of a lake called Wythburn Water. A map of 1646 calls it Thurlemyre, and seems to class it as a river, as does one of 1576. These maps are available on-line here: [ http://www.geog.port.ac.uk/webmap/thelakes/html/lgaz/lk05261.htm]

Last edited at 06:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Book quote

Around the late 18th century when this was written, printers never wrote “it is” as the contraction we know today as “it’s” (though things changed in the first half of the 19th century). When “it’s” was written it was as a possessive form as is used in the quote, so grammatically correct at the time (as far as the printers were concerned). Interestingly, in the Wikipedia documentation around style, there is mention that the preferred style in entries is, “it is”. Something that most editors seem to ignore?

One question though, if we change a quote’s spelling/form to suit the modern audience (eg, fuggefts -> suggests) should we also change the grammar as well?

I have inserted "[sic]" for two reasons: 1. – indicate that the Wikipedia author quoted this directly (though others changes made), and; 2.- as a suggestion to modern audiences that the usage per current English grammar rules is incorrect.

Neils51 (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A quote is a quote is a quote, so what matters is what Gilpin wrote, not whether (by the standards of his day or of ours) his grammar was impeccable.
If I recall Fowler aright the justification of inserting 'sic' should be that one's copy might pass through the hands of printers who might want to 'correct' it according to their views on grammar and spelling but otherwise the urge to do so should be resisted.
What Gilpin's printers printed was not 'fuggefts' but 'ſuggeſts'; they used ſ, the long s form of the letter 's' because they had it in their font and they felt it more appropriate than the curlier form. We haven't (because we don't). Equally, they routinely printed 'ct' with a ligature between the 'c' and the 't': we don't. Those superficial differences are not changes to the quote: they are changes in its appearance, and that is inherent in using any font different from the one the quote was originally printed in. Quotes from the Tyndale Bible do not require correction of spelling and grammar even though the quote is reproduced in Times New Roman, rather than the original blackletter - even less do they require "[sic]" after every departure from current norms.

Rjccumbria (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revised to use hidden sic templates. Neils51 (talk) 14:38, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Class

This fine article is certainly not start class (as advertised till I stuck my oar in). It seems to me to have the potential for GA or even FA, and I hope the main editor will consider that possibility. Tim riley talk 15:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]