Talk:Third Fleet (Australia)

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Maritime High‑importance

	Australia portal Third Fleet (Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian maritime history (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Matilda

Totals don't add up. Total for Matilda is 10 too few & Total is 10 too much. Which is correct, Matilda total or Total of convicts?
Sleigh (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The convict totals for the ship Matilda was taken from http://connectingthefamily.blogspot.com/2011/12/third-fleet-notes.html.Susanperu (talk) 21:59, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers for Queen/Albemarle

According to the particular pages for the ships Queen and Albamarle, the numbers in the table for those two ships seems to be switched.82.113.113.82 (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They were switched. I have corrected the info. It is now correct.Acad Ronin (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two names only?

Why are here two names only under ”convict arrivals in the Third Fleet? Don’t we know more names? It’s a shame to mention two names only from such a huge fleet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.192.114.104 (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]