Talk:Thinkers of the New Left

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fools, Frauds and Firebrands

The article currently states that a revised version of Thinkers of the New Left was published as "Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left." The claim that Fools, Frauds and Firebrands is a new edition of Thinkers of the New Left is supported by a citation, but I'm not sure this is how Scruton himself sees it. I recently looked through his more recent book, and it seems to suggest that Scruton considers Fools, Frauds and Firebrands a new work, not a revision of Thinkers of the New Left. I'll try to provide a quotation to support the point. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is what Scruton writes in the introduction for the 2015 book: "In a previous book published in 1985 as Thinkers of the New Left, I brought together a series of articles from The Salisbury Review. I have reworked the original articles, cutting out writers like R. D. Laing and Rudolf Bahro who have nothing to say to us today, and including substantial new material devoted to developments that are increasingly influential[.]" So it's clearly more than simply a new edition, but not entirely its own thing either. If you want to create a separate article about the 2015 book I'm completely fine with that. Smetanahue (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of balance in Reception

The reception section was a little unbalanced in favour of Scruton's POV (WP:WEIGHT). Before my edit, criticism of the book was only detailed as described by Scruton in his foreword - who describes the criticsm as personal attacks and blackballing. To improve the balance, I have added more detail to describing one of the negative reviews: Colin Crouch's. Meangreenbeanmachine (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]