Jump to content

Talk:Thillana Mohanambal/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 08:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Lead
  • Can you add (a wind instrument) after Nadaswaram for our non Tamil readers.

@Dr. Blofeld: I have added a footnote about the Nadaswaram. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:36, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Correct link to Thiruvarur and in the article body

@Dr. Blofeld: Earlier, it was Tiruvarur, but I guessed someone might have moved the page. So, I have done it as you suggested. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "songs like "Nalandhana", "Maraindhirundhu" and "Pandian Naanirukka" remain popular today." In Tamil Nadu I gather, or southern India? Certainly not on a wider scale. Perhaps add in ...

@Dr. Blofeld: I have done as you suggested. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot
  • "to marry a rich man so that she can be richly" -Avoid repetition of rich

@Dr. Blofeld: I have re-written the sentence as "to marry a wealthy man so that she can settle down in life properly" Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:40, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • What is " Thamizhisai Sangam"?

@Dr. Blofeld: Thamizhisai Sangam is where music and dance is performed. It is a general name for auditoriums and other places where music and dance are perfomed. But I have re-written the line. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to keep pinging me, I have the review open on another tab!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Thank you for mentioning it. :) Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Production
  • "a nadaswaram" -no capital letter this time?

Re-written it with a capital letter and in italics this time. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 09:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Link Padmini in casting.

Linked Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Her character, Mohanambal, vied with Ganesan's character professionally, even though they fell in love in the film" -doesn't really make sense.

Re-written the sentence. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "e suffix "Sikkal" due to his sensitive nature and tendency to get irritated" -makes no sense to non Tamil speakers, add a note on its Tamil meaning or something

Linked "Sikkal". I have written that "Sikkal" means tendency to get into trouble. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Ganesan attended Carnatic music concerts,and" -add space after comma

Added Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Music
  • Can you reword "None of the songs in the film had a singer for Ganesan because it focuses on music and dance."

Re-written as "Ganesan did not have a playback singer for any of the songs in the film." Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • sangati '​s ?? note?

Given. Note d. Also added a reference book source. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 10:48, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reception
  • Repetition of "completed"

Re-written as "had" for one of the repeated words. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The Tamil magazime" -typo

Corrected Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paraphrased. Tell me where I should paraphrase more please. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accolades
I moved them even before I read this here!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
References

The heading of the article was in caps lock, so i wrote it as per written in the source. You want me to change it? Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:05, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Changed Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 11:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Thanks for addressing the points. The prose is still a little choppy, I think it still needs a good copyedit to avoid short sentences and repetition but it seems to have the bulk of what is required. Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]