This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Just wanted to add a note on Geoffroy's cited participation in the 53rd Biennale. The only reliable source I found on the subject was this, an article by Seamus Kealy from the Canadian cmagazine (not freely available, only linked from Geoffroy's site). The article is thorough (and kind of good) but, in line with his work, there is no evidence that he was invited to the Biennale—it looks like he invited himself with an insurgency piece. Anyone can show up in Venice and call themselves an exhibitor—it doesn't associate you with the Biennale's festivities or approval. So it would be incorrect to say that he has exhibited in the Biennale since there are no reliable sources that show that he was invited or officially included in the event in any official, invited capacity. (Side note: it is also ironic to stage an event in opposition to the Biennale for being an elite institution, only then to use that uninvited "participation" [read: showing up unannounced] like a sanctioned endorsement, using the benefits of the event's prestige [that the artwork supposedly intended to subvert] when convenient for your career [read: defending your Wikipedia article's criteria for notability/inclusion].) czar··21:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
His self proclaimed "Biennalist" art format seems to involve him turning up and parasitically recording/filming events, if I understand it correctly. Generally Geoffroy's participation in things seems quite amorphous, or arms-length as a facilitator for other artists. Sionk (talk) 23:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Which is fine—that's his life. My only concern is using his Venice Biennale participation to establish his notability. There are other salient points to make about his notability, but his Venice Bienniale participation was unsanctioned. It's like doing a guerrilla performance piece in the lobby of MoMA and saying you performed there—disingenuous, not useful for a notability argument. czar··23:11, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably the fact there is little coverage of his appearance at the event is testament to the importance (or lack of) we should put on it. If someone makes an unnofficial appearance at a venue or event and it's widely reported, it would add to his Wikipedia notability regardless. Stating the obvious here, I expect :) Sionk (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's actually a really good point. If he was actually in the VB, he would have much more coverage. My comment was more of a warning for the future when press mentions of his VB "exhibition" inevitably slip back in. czar··23:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]