Talk:Theology of Huldrych Zwingli

Theology of Huldrych Zwingli has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 16, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Christianity: Theology / Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group.
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Top-importance).

Expansion to come

At this moment, the article is only taken from a small section in the Huldrych Zwingli article. Once I finish the Zwingli article, I intend to greatly expand it using Stephens and Gäbler as sources. I will most likely modify the current sections and I hope to add sections on Baptism, the State, Christology, etc. --RelHistBuff (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revelation

I am not sure about the statement that he did not hold Revelation in high regard. The article also states that he took the Bible as a whole entity, all the word of God. This is perhaps an attempt at mitigation, but seems more like a blatant contradiction. Surely clarification is necessary here. Zwingli can hardly have failed to hold any part of the word of God in high regard, even if his focus was on certain books more than others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.25.255.214 (talk) 16:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]