This article was created or improved during the Women in Europe contest hosted by the Women in Red project from April to June 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
A fact from Theodolinda Hahnsson appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Only most important details should be in the lead section. You must place the other details to its article's body; and each end of paragraph should have at least one reference. JeBonSer(talk | sign)14:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. This is a comment on the former state of the article and its suitability for the front page, with an implication about the general usefulness about the selection process.
It is also now a comment on the beta edit conflict gizmo. which appears to have eaten my previous removal of the accuracy tag. Qwirkle (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there a long line in front of every year given? A line which seems to consist of several parts, like this one: ––––– It does look weird to me; is that commonly used? --LordPeterII (talk) 21:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's also weird to not call it "Selected works". I recently fixed a similar quirk at Lawrence Weiner, will see what I can do here. Not loving those lines, either, but norms will be norms, I'm afraid. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The reason it looks weird is that a list using a repeat convention, whether ditto marks, dashed lines, or ibidem normally starts with a first use of the thing being repeated. Here, since only one author is represented, they are pointless. Qwirkle (talk) 22:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now seen differently. The years are unparenthesized, which is a bit weird, but that's the template's decision. Further human intervention may be a welcome change. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]