Talk:The Yellow Journal

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albemarle County, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Untitled

This is a forum to discuss edits, changes and revisions to the article The Yellow Journal.

In an effort to maintain some sort of documentation of info presented here, I modified recent edits/contributions by User: 71.191.179.109 regarding the YJ's 80s/90s revival. Specifically removed the paragraph regarding what article/issue/item was specifically referenced in the Supreme Court case. Seems unlikely (though not impossible) that an article from '87 would be used as evidence in '94-'95, especially since there was never a lack of "anti-christian" material in any given issue of the YJ. I would very much like to find out more info as to what YJ evidence was examined by the SCOTUS, and also what was presented on McNeil/Lehrer. I'm not a wiki W:RS stickler per se, just feel we need *even loosely* documented evidence of such. I also moved some of the student names to a new section "YJ Head Guys", but this is also undocumented and we need to verify dates. I feel it may also be appropriate to add a section on "YJ artists", or "Other Notable Alumni", but do not know of any nationally-notable (i.e-FAMOUS) contributors. StopTheSanity (talk) 21:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is still largely unsourced. Additionally, the list of employees/volunteers seems out of place as per WP:NOT. I don't want to jump the gun, but given that it's been 10 months since the only comment here, I'm going to remove the list for now as it's not noteworthy.