Talk:The X-Files season 9/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I've reviewed and passed one other X-Files article, and look forward to another enjoyable experience.
- Clearly written, in good prose with correct spelling and grammar. Also look for proper formatting and general organization of the article, with appropriate use of wikilinks and sections as described in those parts of the Manual of Style referred to in the Good article criteria.
- Factually accurate according to information in reliable sources, preferably with inline citations using either footnotes or Harvard (parenthetical) references.[1] Ideally, a reviewer should have access to the sources cited, and sufficient expertise to verify that the article reflects the content of the sources. At a bare minimum, reviewers should check that the sources used are reliable (for example, blogs are not usually reliable sources), that they support the statements, and that the article contains no plagiarism: any text copied from sources should be contained within quotation marks, or a quotation template.
- Without original research.
- Broad in coverage of the topic without unnecessary digressions.
- Written from a neutral point of view.
- Stable, with no ongoing edit wars (constructive routine editing is fine).
- Compliant with image use policy. Images are encouraged but not required. If images are used, they should have free licenses, or have appropriate fair use rationales.
Reviewer: Christine (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)