Talk:The World Well Lost

Was there any homophobic treatment of homosexuality in earlier SF (earlier than 1953)? Does anyone have any examples? Cbdorsett 09:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

- As far as I'm aware (which isn't that much really) homosexuality was simply not there, unless you count possible homosocial or inferential homosexuality in SF hero fiction. Homophobia requires admitting the existence of homosexuality. MWL 150.203.2.85 05:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC) -- Update: see Odd John 130.56.65.24 06:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)MWL

Or see the Homosexuality in SF and List of gay SF articles :-)

Rootes

The story synopsis and my interpretation of the story doesn't quite mix. As I understand the story, Rootes is as erotically attached to Grunty as Grunty is to Rootes — only more thoroughly repressed. I base that on Rootes exaggerated heterosexuality: he brags about having sex with prostitutes, demands pornography (gets a book on Michelangelo's statues) and rants about fairies and queens. And on the story's assertion that the bond is mutual, but that only Grunty knows what it is.

The story's theme of social conventions forcing you to hide your inner desires (the gentle poet even plots to kill the Loverbirds when he realizes they are telepathic) makes this interpretation of Rootes quite likely, I think. And it makes the story more interesting.

But I have no references. JöG 06:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

- That's something I hadn't picked up on in that. It's quite a valid interpretation, and perhaps one that could be included on the main page. 130.56.65.24 06:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)MWL

Fair use rationale for Image:Universe June 1953.jpg

Image:Universe June 1953.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rational provided. Also added references about its critical reception and importance.Yobmod (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

(Ref 1) Universe and Other Worlds

This (Ref 1) sentence about Universe and Other Worlds is incorrect -- "'Universe Science Fiction', published by Palmer Publications, Inc., was a new name for 'Other Worlds' (q.v.) in June, 1953. It had ten issues before Palmer reverted its name in 1955." As correctly explained in the Wikipedia article on Other Worlds: "Recovering from an accident in 1953, Palmer suspended Other Worlds with the 31st issue (July 1953). He took over the magazine Universe Science Fiction (previously edited for two issues by George Bell). At the same time, Palmer began a short-lived companion titled Science Stories (1953-54). Universe ran for ten issues until March 1955 when Palmer changed the title to Other Worlds while continuing the numeration of Universe. It ran for another 12 issues as Other Worlds with Palmer introducing more material about UFOs. From May 1955 until May 1957 the publishing firm was given as Palmer Publications in Evanston, Illinois." Ths gets _really_ complex because Palmer produced a magazine called "Flying Saucers from Other Worlds" (June, July, Aug and Oct 1957) which pretended to be an SF mag (though it wasn't) but its _final_ all-fiction issue, Oct 1957, was actually (internally) "Other Worlds" for October 1957 http://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?OWSCSTSEP1957 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.105.47.130 (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The World Well Lost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217073942/http://www.spacedoutinc.org/DU-16/WorldWellLost.html to http://www.spacedoutinc.org/DU-16/WorldWellLost.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)