Talk:The Words (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).

I do not believe the plot summary here correctly describes what actually takes place at the end of the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B124:2374:AEC3:A1AD:6AE1:2AAF (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Originality Issue

I had noted earlier that the plotline very closely follows that of an earlier book by Swiss author Martin Suter, had given the title of the book as well as some description of the originality of the plotline. It was removed because it was "inappropriate". I do not wish to enter an edit war, but it was clearly referenced and described and could be verified by anyone -- that is, anyone able to read the original German book. For the others, I tried to describe the similarities clearly. Why is such a remark inappropriate? I think it needs to come back to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.191.191.52 (talk) 07:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For purposes of Wikipedia policy it is considered "original research" to consult primary sources and draw the conclusion that one work was drawn from or inspired by another. Read Wikipedia:No original research. However, there are various reliable sources that can be cited in a Wikipedia article noting the similarity, for example [1] Mathew5000 (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. I removed the section as "unacceptable and unsourced original research"; at no point did I indicate its inclusion was "inappropriate". Since it could be "verified by anyone," the original editor was remiss in not providing references in the first place. Now that appropriate sources have been provided, I'm perfectly content to see it remain. Grandpallama (talk) 14:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]