Talk:The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt/GA2
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 13:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
"The writing was infused with real-life aspects" - this is a bit vague in the lead, can you clarify at all?"some of which were later patched" - this needs a wikilink or explanation; non-gamers might not understand the terminology- "(one steel and one silver)" - I'm not sure if this is worth mentioning, but up to you
- I went into more detail about their function. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- "(who pay in crowns)" - the lead says you earn "gold". Is 'crowns' the type of gold? I'm not sure if this bracketed information is worth mentioning in any case
- You're right, there's no need to go into all of the monetary units. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
"Gies from Polygon" - have I missed something? Why are we only using his surname?'people of color' could be wikilinked to Person of color
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: As I completed the peer review I'm already fairly familiar with this article. Very close to passing once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp:
Done Cognissonance (talk) 10:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Passing. Well done. :) Freikorp (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Freikorp for taking the review. Thank you Darkwarriorblake (plot, setting) and AdrianGamer (gameplay, post-release) for helping me with the article in June. It's a good article now because of you. Cognissonance (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Passing. Well done. :) Freikorp (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Freikorp:
- Pass or Fail: As I completed the peer review I'm already fairly familiar with this article. Very close to passing once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
