Talk:The Wheel (game show)

Television: British / Episode coverage / Game shows Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Sidemen adaptation

Special:Contributions/81.156.5.154, you recently restored disputed content. Please see WP:ONUS for an explanation of why you should advocate for your addition and convince other editors before repeating the edit. My objection is that YouTube videos are generally not a reliable source. We rely on reliable sources to (a) tell us what is true and (b) tell us what is important. I have no doubt that the video is sufficient proof of truth, that the Sidemen are using the set from the show. However, we need a reliable, secondary source reporting on the video to show us that it's important enough for inclusion in this article. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 00:52, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with everything Firefangledfeathers said above. The YouTube video is what is called a primary source - it proves the existence of the show, that is all. Wikipedia needs reliable secondary sources that have a good track history of editorial control and fact checking. Social media, blogs and Wikis (e.g. Wikitubia -The YouTube Wiki) are not reliable because they are self-published or, in the case of wikis, anyone can edit them. - X201 (talk) 07:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would The Global Herald (an online newspaper) paired with the BBC's YouTube video be a suitable secondary source? It corroborates the fact that the Sidemen did indeed use the set, and provides further information on the BBC as a source. On another note, hopefully the presenter (Stephen Tries) will have gained enough traction from this special episode to kick off a career in mainstream TV. If this is the case, at some point in the future (when he has a dedicated Wikipedia page) it may be worth pointing to this adaptation as the start of his mainstream career. — 86.170.36.138 (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC) (previously: 81.156.5.154).[reply]

Episode Results

The results table in the article showing the results of individual episodes should not be in the article because it breaks several Wikipedia policies and guidelines. This information would be much better off on a wiki site like Fandom, on Wikipedia the information breaks the following:

WP:V there are no references in the information.
WP:INDISCRIMINATE "data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources." the information has no context or referenced explanations.
Even WP:DUE applies; The detailed information is only of interest to fans of the show, most readers won't be interested in the specific outcome of each stage of each episode, Wikipedia articles should give a general understanding and not be written specifically for experts on the subject.

As I said above, this information would be better off on Fandom, it would give much more flexibility than having to work within the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. - X201 (talk) 18:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

US counterpart

Just created an Draft version for the American version: here. Shoud it be to continued? GameShowFreak (talk) 11:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]