Talk:The Westin Portland Harborview

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. The leftorium 22:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

What is notable about this hotel? RJFJR (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is over 80 years old and was designed by a prominent architect?--TM 20:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

I plan to move this page to the hotel's current name in about two weeks when it opens as The Westin Portland Harborview. I wanted to be sure there are no objections. I know one user was not pleased when I moved it over the summer and they moved it back. I understand, as the hotel had not yet begun operating under its new name. However after it opens in about two weeks, it will make sense to have the page at that location as the old name, "Eastland Park Hotel", was only used for 11 years of the hotel's 86 year history, and it has changed names so many times that there is not one name under which it is generally known. Having the page under the current name makes the most sense, especially as the building has been entirely gutted and rebuilt on the inside. jamesluckard (talk) 22:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]