Jump to content

Talk:The Way You Love Me (Keri Hilson song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Lead

[edit]
  • Add release date to infobox
It was never released. Jivesh Talk2Me 13:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So what is November 7, 2010? Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It leaked online on that date. Jivesh Talk2Me 06:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Then say so. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Jivesh Talk2Me 09:40, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Needs to be fixed in prose, too. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:04, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Background and conception

[edit]

Controversy

[edit]

Composition

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • I think you should retitle this section "Reception"  Done Jivesh Talk2Me 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Caroline Sullivan of The Guardian said that all the five songs Hilson penned for No Boys Allowed, with the exception of the "frantic electronic firework 'The Way You Love Me', are too featureless to make an impression."" - focus this on TWYLM
This is what i did by adding "with the exception..." Jivesh Talk2Me 09:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There is information (i mean an explanation) about this on the link but i cannot understand what he reviewer wants to say. Jivesh Talk2Me 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you suggest something please? Jivesh Talk2Me 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Chris Parkin Yahoo! Music commented that the "fantastic banger 'The Way you Love Me' [...], [a] filthy song, that makes like the oversexed, doolally cousin of Beyoncé Knowles' "Crazy in Love" (2003)." - umm what? Rewrite
Hmmm even if i put it into quotes? Jivesh Talk2Me 09:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

[edit]
It's like a conversation between them. Jivesh Talk2Me 09:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Summary

[edit]

Quite a bit of work to do here; review is on hold for seven days. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looks fine. Passing now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]