Talk:The Water Table (poetry collection)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 June 2019 and 31 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): User:HistoryNerd52.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note

OK, this needs work. The citation templates are messed up: don't try to stick in an AUM libproxy URL. Get the complete bibliographic information and put that in the citation--pure but clean and correct text inside <ref>...</ref> is better than a useless (sorry, but that's useless: no one off-campus can get anywhere with it) url incorrectly stuck into a template. You need a section on the Content, a section maybe on form, structure, organization, etc. Dr Aaij (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

There really isn't a lot to review here, but the few things that I do notice about the lead is you can add a wikilink to the T. S. Elliot award in the lead. You also don't "have" to cite it in the lead if you're going to cite it further in the article. I would highly suggest using {user| Dr. Aaij}'s article as a reference to add the different sections and style that you could and should follow for this article to make it "GA" and acceptable for a passing grade. The theme section is definitely going in the right direction, but see if you can find a segment of the article that further proves your point. Good luck with the article and let me know if you need help. Cjefferys (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content

I've found some more information about the poem: [1] [2] The first website contains some reviews that could have a section in your article, as well as a couple videos of the author explaining the meaning behind two poems in the book. The second website gives a preview of the introduction of the book. You could create a section on who the poem is dedicated to and provide a brief description on how many poems the book contains (since there seems to be no specific structure for the book.) C.lasia (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryNerd52, I see that you haven't worked on this since 26 June, which is a real shame--because in three weeks you could have easily fixed these strange and incorrect references. Like, this goes nowhere, certainly for people not on our campus, and that citation is so incomplete that I really have no idea what it was supposed to deliver. Dr Aaij (talk) 02:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]