Talk:The Walt Disney Company/Archive/2012
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It seems that the company played an important role in the "anti-PD" :-) lobbying, but this fact is not even mentioned. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 09:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- Something that specific should be added to Criticism of The Walt Disney Company with perhaps a one-sentence summary aded here. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 07:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Figment
Is there any truth to Figment from Epcot actually being magenta. I ask because magenta is not a real color (I'm a physicist trust me)real colors can be made of a pure frequency, magenta is the color our mind creates when our yellow and blue cone receptors are stimulated in our eyes. Therefore making magenta a FIGMENT of our imagination. If anyone was going to make an inside joke that is related to science it would be Disney. I don't know if this was the actual intention, just a happy coincidence, or if this is just me reading to much into this and he is really just purple. ~Thanks 76.16.18.252 (talk) 01:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Ben
- If you're a physicist, you should know that purple is also not a "real" color, as it's the combination of red and blue wavelengths. Regardless, any color our eyes can perceive is a real color, whether it represents a single wavelength of light or not. Powers T 23:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Good point! Purple is the range of extra extra-sensory color on the old RYB color system used by painters before Albert Munsell made the scientific color scales RGB and CMYK in which magenta is the extra-sensory color. 76.16.18.252 (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Ben
- Still the point remains, was Figment purposfully made purple/magenta with the understanding that the color is only created in our mind? Does anyone even know where to start looking for this information? Thanks 76.16.18.252 (talk) 05:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Ben
File:TWDC Logo.svg Nominated for Deletion
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:TWDC Logo.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:TWDC Logo.svg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2012 (UTC) |
Edit request on 18 November 2012
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first sentence under "2005–present: The Iger era" accidentally has the word "January" twice. Sevenhabitsfan (talk) 21:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Done I removed that sentence completely, since it was a fragment and a complete sentence appears later on. RudolfRed (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
We got help!
If we want to improve this article, I'd suggest that we use the article from the French Wikipedia as a source for references. It is a featured article there. Fairly OddParents Freak (Fairlyoddparents1234) C 21:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)