Talk:The Sweeplings

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reassessment request

@PRehse: please reassess. I believe this article easily meets all six B-Class criteria. TIA. ATS (talk) 21:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PRehse: that you are not a listed member of the WPs is not irrelevant—these ratings are intended to be made by project members. Your action to revert me rather than reassess your ratings is also incorrect. Please revert yourself. —ATS (talk) 22:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

B-Class review

... requested. IMO, "Start-Class" as assessed by a non-project member is a gross underestimation and patently phony. —ATS (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment states anyone can assess - it has never been limited to those who happen to add their name.PRehse (talk) 23:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The project page says anyone can assess, PRehse, therefore I withdraw my erroneous objection made on those grounds.

However, there is an accepted norm in Wikipedia that an assessor be competent in rating an article; indeed, per the project page, "Reviewers are expected to follow Wikipedia's article quality grading criteria." By ignoring these criteria, you are thus far refusing to address the foundational argument that your rating is, to repeat, a gross underestimation and patently phony. No article that passes B-Class criteria should ever be rated "Start-Class", and speaks incontrovertibly poorly of your competence to rate this (or any) article. Either address the criteria, or remove your phony rating. —ATS (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "review" per editor failure to address the merits. —ATS (talk) 02:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upgrade

With the inclusion of additional data, I have upgraded this article to B-Class in accordance with content assessment guidelines. It is my belief that this article has for some time met the criteria: properly referenced; well-covered; no errors/omissions; defined; well-written; supporting materials; appropriately understandable.

A-Class or higher would require review independent of my own. ATS (talk) 18:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]