Talk:The Sundering

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 June 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Requested move 3 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. A somewhat marginal case, but generally stronger arguments have been made by the supporters. SST flyer 11:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– The fictional event is a primary topic, as stated by Uanfala. For now, I have turned The Sundering into a disambiguation page. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Steel1943 (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC) --Relisting (2nd) Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support as it's a priomary topic, receiving far more pageviews than the other two articles. This demonstrates usage, but it's also relevant to look at which topic is likely to have a longer-term significance. Although it's a bit difficult to judge between a novel, a series of two novels and an event set of a major role-playing game, the event set happens to also be the setting for several novels, so maybe this points in the same direction as usage. Uanfala (talk) 11:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - When I created this, there was no way to know the relative significance, but I'd say lasting primacy has been shown over the years. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 17:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No primary topic here. And I say that as a long-time roleplayer myself. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:58, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It might have more page views but it's not obviously the primary topic. You can't reasonably claim "long-term significance" for something that's only been around a few years. PC78 (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Torchiest. BOZ (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No strong primary topic. Leave the disambig at the base title so incoming links get fixed and searchers find the page the want. Plantdrew (talk) 04:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.