Jump to content

Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 20, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaguya-chan (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    The first paragraph in Composition and publication has no source
Done. References entered. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Wonderful work. It now meets the GA criteria. Keep up the good work! Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Taylor130":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 18:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]