Jump to content

Talk:The Stakeout (Parks and Recreation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Stakeout (Parks and Recreation) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Stakeout (Parks and Recreation) is part of the Parks and Recreation (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 16, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 18, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that stand-up comedian Louis CK appeared in the Parks and Recreation episode "The Stakeout" as a police officer attracted to Amy Poehler's main character?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Stakeout (Parks and Recreation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:97198 (talk) 02:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the article. It's almost ready to be promoted, but there are a few problems that need fixing first:

I'll put the article on hold for seven days so that the above issues can be addressed, and I'll look over the plot summary's prose once the section has been shortened a bit. Good luck, —97198 (talk) 02:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • All the changes look good. The plot length is definitely fine now (200 to 300 was just a suggestion) and I made one small grammar fix. The Gates image is a bit borderline, but the rationale for fair use is pretty strong so that's fine. I know the blog isn't being used to support anything really controversial, but considering that the article really won't suffer if it's gone, I think the sentence can just be removed. I trust you to do that (if you agree), so I'll go ahead and promote the article. Well done! —97198 (talk) 10:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]