Jump to content

Talk:The Squares of the City

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Squares of the City.jpg

[edit]

Image:Squares of the City.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The game link appears to be the wrong game (4th game of the Steinitz - Chigorin match only 28 moves, the author says the game is 38 moves, the moves do not appear to be correlated with the book as described by the author). Probably, the game link should be to the 16th game.e.g. Event "World Championship 4th"] [Site "Havana"]

[Date "1892.02.07"]

[Round "16"]

[White "Steinitz, William"]

[Black "Chigorin, Mikhail"]

[Result "1-0"]

[ECO "C77"]

[PlyCount "75"]

[EventDate "1892.01.01"]

[EventType "match"]

[EventRounds "23"]

[EventCountry "CUB"]

[Source "ChessBase"]


1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. d3 Bc5 6. c3 b5 7. Bc2 d5 8. Qe2 O-O 9. Bg5 dxe4 10. dxe4 h6 11. Bh4 Qd6 12. O-O Nh5 13. Bg3 Bg4 14. b4 Bb6 15. a4 bxa4 16. Nbd2 Qf6 17. Bxa4 Ne7 18. Qc4 Be6 19. Bxe5 Bxc4 20. Bxf6 Nxf6 21. Nxc4 Nxe4 22. Nxb6 cxb6 23. Rfe1 f5 24. Ne5 Rfc8 25. c4 Ra7 26. f3 Nf6 27. Bb3 Kf8 28. b5 a5 29. Red1 Re8 30. c5 bxc5 31. Rd6 Rb8 32. Rad1 Raa8 33. b6 a4 34. Bxa4 Kg8 35. Nc6 Nxc6 36. Bxc6 Ne8 37. b7 Ra7 38. Rd8 1-0--24.68.154.148 (talk) 21:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would be more comprehensible to me (and many people like me) if it were rewritten in English descriptive notation. You should bear in mind how ahistorical your comment is, as algebraic notation was not used in 1892. Dexter Nextnumber (talk) 02:23, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]