Talk:The Sopranos/GA2
GA Review
[edit]Good article nomination on hold
[edit]This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of September 3, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Written in clear and understandable wording.
- 2. Factually accurate?: The majority of the article is cited very well, I went in a added some {{fact}} tags,
these should be addressed before the GA Hold is up. - 3. Broad in coverage?: Indeed.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written in a neutral manner.
- 5. Article stability? A bit of changes through the edit history as the article has been worked on a bit, however no evidence of any significant conflicts going back a couple months. Keep an eye on those IP edits. No major conflicts evident upon inspection of talk page either.
- 6. Images?: 4 fair-use images, fair use rationale provided on image pages.
Please go through and change the fair-use rationale style to a box like this one Image:Sopranosposters2.jpg, for the other three fair-use images Image:Sopranos6.jpg, Image:Sopranos titlescreen.png, and Image:SopranosVanityFair.jpg.This image Image:Sopranos-ontheset.jpg should be moved to Wikimedia Commons.
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
GA Passed
[edit]Excellent work by Thebogusman (talk · contribs), thanks for addressing my above points. Cirt (talk) 03:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)